Major Decision By Court: AR-15’s are NOT Protected Under the 2nd Amendment

  • The gun debate is always a hot button topic especially when it comes to hunters, outdoor enthusiasts, and people living off the grid.

    It seems that this topic just got a little bit hotter due to a landmark decision by The U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals who have decided that the AR-15 is not protected by the Second Amendment of the United States Consitution.

    Let's take a look at what they said and how they came to this major decision. 

    Next Page »



    238 Comments

    1. Timmy Crouch said:

      It is my belief, backed by the words of the constitution, that we have a right to keep and bear any and all arms that may be used against us.

    2. Emilio Badillo said:

      Once again, banning weapons will only stop those of us who abide by the law. And criminals are criminals because they don’t follow the law.

    3. George Parsons said:

      who cares what the court says? they are over paid and under educated. we the people have the right and we the people will keep our rights.

    4. Scooter Harms said:

      Um not I live in the city… I need way more the someone living in the woods

    5. Mike Blevins said:

      Actually the constitution said “arms” and that weapon meets that definition, so by default, they’ve changed the meaning of “arms” and by doing so, they’ve opened themselves up being challenged ON MANY MANY OTHER WEAPONS, that they will be forced to litigate over and over. Then have the decisions reversed over and over

    6. Mike Blevins said:

      It’s written that way in the federalist papers, and several other quotes by the founding fathers

    7. Eric Baine said:

      Wasn’t aware that they excluded any weapons in the right to bare arms….Damn they were smart if they knew of ar’s back then

    8. Scott Paddock said:

      Trump isn’t coming for$#%&!@* You need to learn how to read, and comprehend what you read: THE COURT says AR15’s aren’t covered by the Second. Last time I checked, the Court was the Judicial Branch, and Trump is the head of the Executive Branch.

      Not that I believe one word of this “article”. Until I see this “news” from multiple outlets, I’ll consider it Fake News.

    9. Ari Santoso said:

      MR. PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE ORDER

      – – – – – – –

      DESIGNATION OF MILITIA RIFLES

      By the authority vested in me as President and Commander in Chief of the Militia by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to ensure the ability of citizens of the United States to defend themselves, their communities and their States, as well as to ensure the safety and security of our Nation, I hereby order as follows:

      Section 1. Purpose. Both individual and community safety are critically important to the national security of the United States. Terrorism, transnational criminal activity and potential acts of war by foreign nations present a significant threat to national security and our citizens, who have the right and the duty to defend themselves, their communities, their States and the Nation.

      Section 2. Policy. It is the policy of the executive branch to:

      (a) Support and defend the Constitution, including the Second Amendment right of citizens to keep and bear arms for Militia purposes,as well asself-defense.

      (b) Encourage citizens to be prepared to act as members of the Militia to defend communities, States and the Nation, as part of the common defense contemplated by the Constitution of the United States.

      (c) Discourage restrictions by States and political subdivisionson individual possession of firearms suitable for Militia purposes by citizens of the United States.

      Section 3. Definitions.

      (a) “Militia” has the meaning given the term in Title 10, Section 311 of the United States Code to include the Unorganized Militia, as well as the meaning given to the term “Militia” under equivalent State statutes.

      (b) “Self-Defense” shall mean the actions of citizens to defend themselves and their families from physical attack.

      (c) “Communities” shall mean neighborhoods, towns, cities, counties and other political subdivisions of citizens who live in distinct geographic areas within a State.

      (d) “State” shall mean one of the fifty States of the United States.

      (e) “Militia Purposes” shall mean training, practice and preparedness which could improve the ability of a citizen to act,and to be armed in case of a need to act, as a current or future member of a local, State or National organization commanded by government officials and responsive to a physical threat. Appropriate organizations include those commanded by an elected county or city Sheriff; those commanded by the Governor of a State through officers of that State’s Defense Force as authorized by Title 30, Section 109 of the United States Code, or through officers of that State’s National Guard;and organizations commanded by the President through officers of the Active or Reserve components of U.S. Armed Forces.

      (f) “Militia Rifles” shall mean the firearms designated in Section 4 that are made in America and suitable for use in self-defense, community defense, defense of States and defense of the Nation.

      Section 4. Designation of Militia Rifles. That the following firearmsand accessories are authorized and appropriate for individual citizens to keep and bear for Militia purposes under the Constitution and the laws of the United States:

      (a) The AR-15 and similar semi-automatic rifles, to include flashsuppressors and bayonet lugs, magazines of up to thirty round capacities, M-7 bayonets, and ammunition in 5.56NATO or .223 Remington, in all quantities.

      (b) The M1A and similar semi-automatic rifles, to include flashsuppressors and bayonet lugs,magazines of up to twenty round capacities, M-6 bayonets, and ammunition in 7.62 NATO or .308 Winchester, in all quantities.

      (c) The M1 Garandand similar semi-automatic rifles, to include flashsuppressors and bayonet lugs, M-5 bayonets, and ammunitionin.30-’06 Springfield, in all quantities.

      (d) Bolt action riflesin the calibers of .30-’06 Springfield; 7.62 NATO or .308 Winchester; 5.56NATO or .223 Remington; or any substantially equivalent caliber, and ammunitionappropriate for the rifles, in any quantity.

      (This list could be expanded or replaced by a broad definition)

      Section 5. Pre-emption. This Executive Order is intended to pre-empt the laws of States or political subdivisions that infringe upon the rights of citizens to keep and bear the arms designated in Section 4.

      Section 6. Judicial Notice. That the judges of all State and FederalCourts are hereby given notice that possession of the designated Militia Rifles and accessories by citizens should not be restricted or infringed upon by State laws or the laws of a political subdivision of a State and any such law should be reviewed under the strict scrutiny standard to determine whether it is a violation of the Constitution of the United States after judicial consideration of this Order and the fact that it was issued by the Commander in Chief of the Militia.

      Donald J. Trump

      THE WHITE HOUSE

      March __, 2017

      PROPOSED EXECUTIVE ORDERDESIGNATES MILITIA RIFLES FOR CITIZEN OWNERSHIP

    10. Los Blanc said:

      They’re never going to come after “muh 2nd Amendment” anymore than they’ll go after “muh Row vs Wade”.

      Those are just wedge issues used to herd the sheep to one voting booth over the other.

    11. Carvis Norton said:

      Shhh. No one tell them about the SKS. Been around for years and they freck on this look. They just don’t want anyone carrying same thing as their UN ghosts.

    12. Matthew Fitch said:

      The 2nd Amendment claims the right to bear “arms.” The word “gun,” or “assault rifle,” are never written. I’m glad the Court interpreted this subjective phrasing in a reasonable manner.

    13. Nico Gudino said:

      Free people don’t need permission to own or carry any firearm.
      Only slaves require permission (permit) to own or carry any firearm.

    14. Joseph Knox said:

      Luckily, AR-15 owners are totally capable of protecting themselves.

    15. Thomas Michael Anderson said:

      This was proposed and not effective yet.. as far as I have read at least. I best line of defense on this is to be educated and not jump the gun on it.. liberals want our guns taken, let’s all not give them reason to.

    16. Thomas Michael Anderson said:

      This was proposed and not effective yet.. as far as I have read at least. I best line of defense on this is to be educated and not jump the gun on it.. liberals want our guns taken, let’s all not give them reason to.

    17. Thomas Michael Anderson said:

      This was proposed and not effective yet.. as far as I have read at least. I best line of defense on this is to be educated and not jump the gun on it.. liberals want our guns taken, let’s all not give them reason to.

    18. Thomas Michael Anderson said:

      This was proposed and not effective yet.. as far as I have read at least. I best line of defense on this is to be educated and not jump the gun on it.. liberals want our guns taken, let’s all not give them reason to.

    19. Thomas Michael Anderson said:

      This was proposed and not effective yet.. as far as I have read at least. I best line of defense on this is to be educated and not jump the gun on it.. liberals want our guns taken, let’s all not give them reason to.

    20. Thomas Michael Anderson said:

      This was proposed and not effective yet.. as far as I have read at least. I best line of defense on this is to be educated and not jump the gun on it.. liberals want our guns taken, let’s all not give them reason to.

    21. Thomas Michael Anderson said:

      This was proposed and not effective yet.. as far as I have read at least. I best line of defense on this is to be educated and not jump the gun on it.. liberals want our guns taken, let’s all not give them reason to.

    22. Micah Haley said:

      SCOTUS already shot this stupid non-argument down with Heller.

    23. Matt Schultz said:

      Looks like we have the “Nutty Ninth” and the “Fruity Fourth” now. It’s time to start replacing all of these liberal judges.

    24. Christopher D Mills said:

      We’ll all be criminals soon enough. If we’re all criminals than the word loses all meaning.

    25. Kyle Harris said:

      This is bullshit! But just in case any liberals out there that want to try & take mine, bear your arms & let’s get it on……

    26. Edwin A. Rodriguez said:

      Please don’t lump hunters in with anything ar-15 related. If you need that to drop a buck stop pretending you hunt and go back to Starbucks

    Leave a Reply to Scooter Harms Cancel reply

    *

    *

    Top